Chancellor Andre Bouchard is now the subject of a Federal “Department of Justice” Investigation, according to an article published in a Spanish Newspaper.
All this writer can say at the moment is, “Wow… I hope
this is true, because it is about time!”
If you’ll remember, TransPerfect has over 500 employees in
Spain, where unemployment is very high. As I see it, Bouchard, by using his
position improperly, tried to engineer a hostile takeover of TransPerfect by
its largest competitor, HIG/Lionbridge. As a result, it seems since Chancellor
Bouchard put so many Spanish jobs at risk, the international media there has
been fervently following the case.
I called the U.S. Office of Public Affairs, which handles
press inquiries for the U.S. Department of Justice, to find out more about this
investigation and confirm that it’s ongoing. No comments were provided by press
time.
As to the TransPerfect case, it is my understanding and in
my personal view, it is now commonly accepted in business circles that Bouchard
might have abused his power, and made absurd rulings that feathered the nests
of Skadden Arps, his lawyer friends, and their combined cronies to the tune of $250
million in TransPerfect funds. Folks, in my opinion, there are truly the
appearances of impropriety here and they must be investigated.
Please see the article below and ask yourself: Does Delaware
need a judiciary that looks crooked enough to even make the Department of
Justice consider launching an investigation? If this is true, what will that do
to our reputation?
As always your comments are welcome and I will continue to follow the largest corporate case, and in my view, the largest heist by a judge, in American history — the public deserves answers, transparency, and accountability.
BARCELONA, 29 (EUROPE PRESS)
The management of the TransPerfect case, led by the Supreme
Court Justice of Delaware, André Bouchard, is being investigated by the US
Department of Justice, according to a statement issued by the highest court in
the United States.
The forced sale of this multinational, which has 600 jobs in
its offices in Barcelona, ended in the courts of Delaware and now the US
justice investigates the judicial team that managed the sale process of the
company for alleged discrimination during 2017, when the company was under your
control.
Associations of Delaware citizens say that as the
investigation progresses it may also address other irregularities such as the $
250 million that allegedly disappeared from the TransPerfect bank accounts
while representatives of the Delaware Supreme Court controlled the company.
They emphasize “the opacity” with which Judge
Bouchard has taken the case, arriving at not making public the judicial file
months after the resolution, something contrary to the current US legislative
framework.
They also denounce that one of the law firms that has
benefited the most in the conflict has been a law firm of which one of its
partners, Robert Pincus, was appointed judicial administrator of the company
during the conflict.
However, the management of the case has called into question
the neutrality of the judicial system of Delaware, according to a report by the
US Chamber of Commerce.
TransPerfect closed the year 2018 with revenues of more than
600 million euros, 14.7% more than the previous year, and has offices in
Barcelona, Madrid and Palma de Mallorca, Spain being the second country in the
world where the multinational It has more employees, only behind the United
States.
When it comes to corruption in Delaware’s Chancery Court,
the public must now assume: where there is smoke, there is fire!
According to a recent complaint in Federal Court,
TransPerfect’s #1 competitor was invited to participate in the
“auction” — but instead the competitor seems to have used the
Chancery’s “airtight” auction process as a massive platform to steal
TransPerfect’s trade secrets. So much for the public expectation of Delaware’s
Chancellor Bouchard to comply with his sworn duty to protect Delaware
companies– APPARENTLY NOT!
Some conspiracies fly under the radar because they are too
complicated to garner the appropriate attention, but remember folks, these
judges, lawyers, and good old boy Delaware elitists are sophisticated actors —
it’s no coincidence that $250 million was spent on lawyers and custodial fees.
Behold the following facts:
1. HIG/Lionbridge is TransPerfect’s #1 competitor.
2. Custodian Pincus of Skadden Arps allowed HIG/Lionbridge
unfettered access to hundreds of thousands of corporate documents, including
the most guarded secrets of TransPerfect.
3. HIG/Lionbridge is a client of the Skadden law firm.
4. HIG/Lionbridge is a client of Credit Suisse (but abruptly
switched sides to “represent” TransPerfect for Pincus).
5. HIG had a loan with Credit Suisse, so IF Credit Suisse
could have swung the auction results to HIG/Lionbridge, it would have helped
Credit Suisse. They call this a “conflict of interest.”
6. The “conflict of interest” would normally have
called for Credit Suisse to resign, but something made them feel protected
enough not to resign.
7. Skadden Arps alumni include none other than: Chancellor
Andre Bouchard, Custodian Robert Pincus, and Chief Justice Leo Strine
(Bouchard’s former intern).
The above information is gleaned from my two years of
research in following all the details of this case. If you think I may have the
facts wrong, then please read the following link below: publicly available in a
New York Supreme Court filing:
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=qvdJYpXr7_PLUS_7tMrkT9_PLUS_oWMg==
Is all this just coincidence? But folks, we must ask
ourselves is the $250 million dollars spent and distributed among Bouchard’s
cronies and former business partners (Skadden Arps Law firm) a legitimate
situation?
Credit Suisse is also more likely to be paid back on their
HIG/Lionbridge debt, if HIG/Lionbridge got a leg up in the competitive market
for translation by getting its hands on all of TransPerfect’s trade secrets,
including detailed client information, and including decision-makers and price
lists.
Perhaps the alleged trade secret theft happened with
HIG/Lionbridge acting on their own, but given all these connections, perhaps
not. You decide! Please read the article
below and send me your feedback. Your comments are welcome and appreciated.
By Pete Brush
Law360, New York (April 15, 2019, 5:47 PM EDT) —
TransPerfect Global has sued rival translation company Lionbridge Technologies
and private equity firm H.I.G. Capital for $300 million, claiming in Manhattan
federal court that they exploited a court-ordered sale of TransPerfect equity
to lift trade secrets.
The Thursday lawsuit, pending before U.S. District Judge
Denise L. Cote, claims that a unit of Miami-based H.I.G., H.I.G. Middle Market
LLC, engaged in “fake bidding” during the $770 million sale of a 50%
stake in New York-based TransPerfect to help Massachusetts-headquartered
Lionbridge gain an unfair advantage.
“For H.I.G., losing the auction was not a defeat because it was able to accomplish its refocused goal to gain an unfair competitive advantage over [TransPerfect],” the suit says.
H.I.G. and Lionbridge had discussed a go-private deal in 2016 that could have seen the private equity firm take control of both companies and permitted Lionbridge to “solidify its position as the dominant translations services provider worldwide,” the suit says.
H.I.G. completed its acquisition of Lionbridge in early 2017. But, according to the suit, even though TransPerfect co-founder Philip R. Shawe later that year won the auction for the TransPerfect stake, H.I.G. and Lionbridge still profited by gaining access to secrets that were pilfered from what should have been an airtight process mandated by a Delaware business court.
Credit Suisse, which handled the auction and is not a party to the lawsuit, “failed to take meaningful steps to protect the company’s confidential information, and defendants were permitted to freely interview
[TransPerfect’s] management and downloaded [its] top client lists, pricing information, commission schedules, employee files, and sales strategies,” the suit says. The suit adds that Credit Suisse owns Lionbridge debt and was “incentivized” to help H.I.G. shore up that debt.
H.I.G.’s conduct also delayed completion of the sale to Shawe and disrupted the plaintiff’s business, the suit says.
The sale of TransPerfect assets stemmed from a dispute between Shawe and company co-founder Elizabeth Elting over how to run the company that dates to 2014. H.I.G. improperly contacted Elting during the asset auction and assisted her in objecting to the sale to Shawe, the lawsuit says.
Lionbridge continues to use TransPerfect’s proprietary information to compete unfairly, according to the suit. TransPerfect seeks injunctive relief as well as damages, including punitive damages, in excess of $300 million.
Requests for comment from Lionbridge and H.I.G. were not returned. A lawyer representing TransPerfect declined comment. Credit Suisse declined comment.
TransPerfect is represented by Andrew Goodman of Garvey Schubert Barer and Martin Russo and Sarah Khurana of Kruzhkov Russo PLLC.
The case is TransPerfect v. Lionbridge et al., case number 1:19-cv-03283, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
–Editing by Amy Rowe.
In my educated opinion, after over a year of intense research on the TransPerfect case, it is not only the very suspicious and biased decisions from Chancellor Bouchard of the Delaware Chancery Court at issue, but the highly unusual conduct of his Court-appointed Custodian, Skadden attorney Robert Pincus which, in my opinion, leads to the only logical conclusion that a conspiracy, based on greed and inbred corruption, is at work in Delaware. What a shame that the glorious reputation of our tiny, but first state of Delaware, will have it’s national reputation smeared and destroyed by a small group of selfish attorneys, judges and investment bankers.
As the saying goes, when something feels so wrong, follow the money (please see this New York Court document):
I spoke with several TransPerfect employees about why they left recently, and here’s a big reason that is not easy to explain: The auction they have been forced to participate in by Chancellor Bouchard, as a management team, as it turns out, is believed by many employees to be a sham.
First, it is filled with conflicts of interest. TransPerfect’s main competitor, Lionbridge is a company with a deep history of eliminating U.S. and Western European jobs to send them offshore (TransPerfect has most of its jobs in America, Lionbridge has 6% of its jobs in the good-ole US of A). Lionbridge is owned by the private equity firm, HIG. Credit Suisse is the investment bank allegedly running a fair auction, but therein lies the rub. HIG also happens to be a client of BOTH Skadden Arps and Credit Suisse (CS). Is Bouchard’s apparent and possible Ponzi scheme starting to come into view for you now? It becomes clearer to me everyday. It’s like the Uranium One scandal, but on steroids — with U.S. jobs being the victim instead of our national security.
Here’s my opinion: It gets shadier and shadier… Credit Suisse owns the risky Lionbridge debt, who as they say in the industry, was a “dog with fleas” and it seems the only way CS can get this risky debt paid back to them is by steering the fair auction away from Shawe, and toward their other client HIG. If HIG can buy out its biggest rival and eliminate the competition, “HIG-owned Lionbridge”, will be in a much better position to pay Credit Suisse back its debt; otherwise it cannot. Ahhh… but this onion still has more layers to be peeled. Equally disturbing is that the Custodian, Bob Pincus, works for Skadden; and Skadden (Bouchard and Judge Strine’s old firm) are attorneys for both CS and HIG!!! How can the Chancery let all these people that work together, seemingly scratch each others backs to get richer and richer. Only in Delaware folks, can such blatant and gregarious corruption be tolerated and allow to exist.
Think about it: Why would the Custodian choose CS to run the auction when CS just months ago advised and raised money for HIG’s purchase of TransPerfect’s #1 competitor, Lionbridge?? It stinks to high heaven!!! Further, in my opinion, Bob Pincus and Skadden should immediately cease their role as Custodians, because, as attorneys to both Credit Suisse and HIG, they are anything but neutral; in fact, they owe CS and HIG a duty of undivided loyalty — so how can Skadden run a fair auction and pick a fair winner? I guess the answer is always the same…. only in Delaware.
Let’s not forget that back in August of 2015, Chancellor Bouchard ordered the sale of a thriving profitable company for the first time in the history of Delaware to help Co-CEO Elizabeth Elting get a better price for her shares, indeed that the market was not willing to bear. Most importantly, he said that the sale should be conducted with the intention of maintaining the company as a going concern.
Well Chancellor Bouchard, below is an article about all the defections at TransPerfect and the loss of the entire C-level suite and senior technology team, since you handed down your unprecedented order. Is this what you meant by keeping the company going- “as a going concern??” What you can’t tell from reading the public material that I will tell you from talking to the staff, is that no meetings are taken seriously or attended by Credit Suisse big wigs or by the Alvarez & Marsal consultants except for…? You guessed it, the HIG-Lionbridge meetings. The other meetings are attended only by CS neophytes. These employees are honorable, and they have fought to keep this company afloat while the custodian Bob Pincus, Skadden Arrps and his army of consultants looted over $25 million from TransPerfect with Skadden billing $1 million last month alone.
The same employees who have continued to hold this great company together and raise the revenues every year for TransPerfect have been abused by the court and the custodian for sure. Only they know from attending the auction meetings that HIG-Lionbridge is the Chancery’s pre-determined winner — and the vast majority of them will get their jobs shipped overseas, thanks to the crooked Delaware court system — I don’t blame them at all for leaving on their own terms.
I promised you folks, I would uncover the dirt, but I had no idea how deep this ditch would go. This plot is still thickening and I will keep digging until I find out what I suspect is the truth: I believe this whole thing is rigged: the $150 million no-witness trial, the unprecedented result and the “auction” remedy. I feel the money trail will lead straight back to the Delaware elite. I hope Bouchard and his cronies are listening and robes or not, no one gets a pass in my column. This is not the News Journal, where you can get coverage stopped with a well-placed phone call. I’m here for you, my readers, and this investigative journalist will not stop fighting until justice prevails.
by Florian Faes, Slator, October 25, 2017
More than three years of litigation about the future of TransPerfect is beginning to take its toll. Over the past two weeks, three senior TransPerfect technology executives have resigned, citing among other reasons the uncertainty created by the court-ordered forced sales process.
Chief Technology Officer (CTO), Mark Hagerty, left the company after more than 15 years with TransPerfect. Chief Information Officer, Yu-Kai Ng, who joined 12 years ago, left shortly thereafter. Keith Brazil, a senior member of Hagerty’s technology team, then resigned on October 23, 2017 after nearly 18 years with the company.
In his 6-page letter of resignation, obtained by Slator and addressed to Robert Pincus, the court-appointed custodian in charge of the TransPerfect sale, former CTO Hagerty explains that when he joined the company, TransPerfect “had no technology at all, it licensed Trados and SDLX and products from competitors.”
Hagerty says that he initiated the development of and initially personally coded TransPerfect’s translation management systems (TMS) GlobalLink Content Director and GlobalLink Project Director, which he says are “the cornerstone of the entire TransPerfect production operation.”
According to the letter, TransPerfect’s website proxy localization solution GlobalLink OneLink generated USD 31m in licensing revenue over the past six years. GlobalLink Project Director, meanwhile, generated USD 40m in licensing revenue over the same period. This would make it one of the top TMS globally if considered as a stand-alone product.
Hagerty expressed his frustration at Custodian Robert Pincus in detail. His reasons for leaving include concerns about the legality of transferring WordFast source code to an attorney at Pincus’ law firm Skadden, despite a letter of indemnity from Pincus. The future of Wordfast has emerged as a contentious issue in the sale process.
Hagerty also expressed anxiety over the release of his W-2 information in a data theft, which he alleged was due to the untrained accounting staff at Alvarez and Marsal, the firm appointed by Pincus to run TransPerfect’s accounting department. Hagerty also wondered why he had not received a pay rise for two years and questioned his future role in the company post sale.
Sale is Imminent
Slator reached out to Co-CEOs Phil Shawe and Liz Elting, as well as to custodian Robert Pincus for their comment on these departures.
Shawe said “Speaking personally, the senior technology team that decided to leave were tremendous assets to TransPerfect. If the court-appointed custodian would allow me to address the concerns that they expressed, I would be happy to attempt to re-open a dialogue in the spirit of retention. In any case, their contributions were tangibly responsible for our success in technology, and much of our success as a company. They will be sorely missed.”
Co-CEO Liz Elting emailed to Slator that “the recent departures of these few technology employees represent a very positive, not negative, development at TransPerfect, as I have long regarded each of them as underperformers. We have a deep bench of extremely talented and dedicated employees in our technology department who are more than capable of continuing to build on our success. There will now be more opportunities for each of them. In addition, we will soon be making some very exciting leadership announcements in our technology department, which will help take TransPerfect to a billion dollars in revenue and beyond.”
Meanwhile Custodian Robert Pincus is proceeding with the sale. He told Slator in a phone call that “the business is strong due to the strong entrepreneurial culture of the employees. We are supplementing and enhancing the management of the technology group in a manner that will help facilitate continuity pending the consummation of the sale. Efforts to confuse, delay, and deter the sales process have accelerated as we get closer to a culmination of the sale process.”
According to sources Slator has spoken to, the sale process has entered its final round and a winner will be selected in the next 30 to 60 days. However, before the closing either one of the Co-CEOs could still take further legal action and challenge how the sale process was run or how the winning bid was selected.
Please note new e-mail address,
[email protected]
Please note new
Twitter account, https://twitter.com/Judson_Bennett
Open to see all my articles on TransPerfect caseA court drama being played out may result in TransPerfect’s two chief competitors in the translations services industry seeing increased revenue.
Lionbridge Technologies (LIOX), based in Waltham, Mass., is the largest translation services company in the U.S., with revenue of $560 million last year. TransPerfect is the second largest in the U.S., with revenue last year of $505 million. London-based SDL (SDLLF) could also benefit.
While beating its rival handedly in growth and profits, TransPerfect is experiencing a serious power struggle in the executive suite that has ended up in the courtroom. Lionbridge has attempted to capitalize on this controversy and courtroom drama by planting seeds of doubt on the future of TransPerfect with its customers.
However, this may not be the boon LIOX is expecting. Although TransPerfect’s power struggle began in 2013, it has shown no signs of slowing down the company. So far this year, sales are up more than 11% with May being the most successful month to date. Whatever the Delaware Chancery Court decides, there will inevitably be a lengthy appeal process and co-founder visionary Phil Shawe has made it clear that he is not going anywhere.
The Delaware state court’s apparent willingness to step into the affairs of a private company has come under fire from many directions, including most-notably former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who criticized Delaware’s new Chief Chancellor
Andre Bouchard (a Canadian) for an “un-American” decision that was overreaching, intrusive, and against American free-market principles.
Co-CEO and fellow shareholder Elizabeth Elting, who according to many employees has a very limited role in the day-to-day functions of the company, is suing for TransPerfect to be dissolved and force-sold to the highest bidder. When Elting co-founded the business with Shawe 24 years ago they had had a romantic relationship, but that ended years ago. She now claims the two cannot work together anymore and that the New York-based company should be auctioned off because she is upset with their personal relationship. It is also obvious that Elting is now using the court as a weapon to maximize her buyout price.
Shawe recently offered $300 million cash to buy her half of the company. In an attempt to extract more money from Shawe, Elting recently told Forbes Magazine that she intends to counter, but no offer has been forthcoming. It appears Elting believes the Delaware Court will give her a better exit strategy than she can achieve through negotiation, and thus, is content to wait it out until Bouchard’s decision and all appeals, are rendered final.
TransPerfect is the largest privately-held company in the $35 billion translation services industry. With 4,000 employees in 100 cities on four continents TransPerfect is capable of translating more than 170 languages. It has a vast array of clientele, including almost every Fortune 500 company, such as USPS, IKEA, Johnson & Johnson, and Hilton Worldwide.
Elting has used a strategy of saying “no” to all routine decisions to create “deadlock” under Delaware law, and therefore wants the court to auction the company to the highest bidder. Unable to find a judge receptive to her case in New York , she filed a second lawsuit two years ago in Delaware. In the non-jury trial, despite the fact that Elting couldn’t produce one witness to corroborate her testimony, while Shawe presented 10 witnesses on his behalf, the judge sided with Elting on dissolution, and appointed a custodian to oversee a sale process.
This means for the first time in U.S. history, a private, profitable company that has not been accused of any wrongdoing or impropriety is being put on the auction block. Although the harm caused by Chancellor Bouchard’s use of the word “sale” has raised eyebrows with many TransPerfect employees and customers, Bouchard also said he believed that Shawe was the most logical buyer. In the meantime the court has put a middleman in charge of the company for the purpose of having it dissolved and force-sold against the wishes of two of its three shareholders. Elting owns half, while Shawe and his mother own the other 50%.
It appears the employees, TransPerfect’s most important assets, are extremely upset with Bouchard and his apparent willingness to rely on the uncorroborated testimony of one witness who serves no meaningful role at the company. Hoping to save the company they work for, as well as their jobs, the employees wrote to the judge before he rules on the bizarre case currently before him.
On April 26, TransPerfect’s employees sent two letters to Bouchard; Peter C. Schwartzkopf, the speaker of the Delaware House of Representatives; other members of the Delaware house; and the media to present their perspective before a final ruling in the case.
In order to inform the public of their situation, a group of 610 TransPerfect employees called Citizens for a Pro-Business Delaware ran radio ads on local Delaware stations. They also placed a two-page advertisement in the Delaware News Journal that reprinted the contents of each letter. So far, the employees have not received a response from Bouchard, who has issued a series of unprecedented decisions that are so unusual and blatantly one-sided that observers say they are not based on law and equity.
Shawe’s lawyer Martin Russo of New York law firm Gusrae Kaplan Nusbaum told
Slator.com , “Ms. Elting has the right now to sell her shares on the open market without interference from, or affecting Shawe’s ownership rights; but that she chooses not to take the market price is an indicator as well. Shawe’s $300 million offer is magnanimous, and is surely better than (what Ms Elting) would get as a 50% owner on the market.” Russo told the website the value represents 10x the company’s after-tax cash flow profits of 30 million and described the $300 million offer for Elting’s 50% stake as “extremely generous.”
However, if Elting refuses the offer and forces the sale, this could provide a big opportunity for either Lionbridge or SDL to purchase TransPerfect and become the undisputed leader of the translation industry.
